ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Contractors performing or communicating science or advising on scientific issues for the US Environmental Protection Agency must abide by the EPA’s policy to protect scientific integrity, according to a rule that the agency issued Oct. 19.
The regulation is legally enforceable and affects organizations that conduct paid research such as field sampling, laboratory experiments, and computer modeling for the EPA.
Among other provisions, the rule prohibits contractors from “attempted or actual intimidation or coercion of scientists to alter scientific data, findings, or professional opinions or non-scientific influence of scientific advisory boards.” It also bars hampering the “timely release of scientific findings or conclusions.”
Robert Kavlock, former acting assistant administrator for research and development at the EPA, endorses scientific integrity policies for all research the agency conducts or supports. But he has questions about how the new rule will be put in action. “How will it be implemented for the non-EPA workforce, who oversees it, how do they get trained, how is it reviewed, and what resources are needed by EPA to ensure it is implemented? It has to be more than words on paper,” says Kavlock, who retired from the agency in 2017 after over 30 years there. He is now a consultant.
Like most federal agencies, the EPA adopted a scientific integrity policy in response to a 2009 executive order from President Barack Obama.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X