Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.


Research Integrity

India must change how it evaluates researchers, Indian National Science Academy says

by K. V. Venkatasubramanian, special to C&EN
July 6, 2018 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 96, ISSUE 28


The Indian National Science Academy (INSA) is deeply concerned about the absence of consensus criteria in India for assessing scientific excellence, it says in a policy statement that criticizes a “publish or perish” culture that dominates evaluation of scientists’ work.

“Inappropriate guidelines about assessment by different agencies and their misuse have seriously vitiated the research output and assessment scenario in the country” and led to the mushrooming growth of predatory journals and conferences, INSA says in the statement.

INSA’s recommendations to address the problem include:

Evaluating researchers based on the impact of what instead of where they publish, including categorizing research as confirming previous knowledge, advancing science incrementally, or resulting in a significant breakthrough.

Identifying the specific contribution of each author of a paper.

Giving additional weight to papers published in established Indian journals if citations of the papers significantly exceed the average citation rate of the journal.



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Radhakrishnamurty Padyala (August 14, 2018 7:30 AM)
The recommendations of INSA to evaluate researchers are excellent and well thought of. If implemented in the right spirit they could yield results that could make the recommendations, guide lines for others to emulate.
I congratulate the INSA team responsible for the recommendations.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment