ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Hydrogen fluoride
In the Aug. 24, 2020, issue of C&EN, a two-page feature article by Michael McCoy was published on “a new route to hydrogen fluoride” with the subheadline “In a first for the US, the fluorochemical raw material will be made from a fertilizer industry by-product” (page 24). While I agree that this is a very worthwhile undertaking to utilize an environmental pollutant for supplying an important raw material for fluorochemical makers, the article omitted important information on the history of this process. The concept of using the SiF4 by-product from fertilizer plants as a source of HF and using it as a starting material for the synthesis of fluorocarbons is neither new nor a first for the US. It was developed 60 years ago in the US at Stauffer Chemical in Richmond, California, by Albert Mohr. The Mohr process was utilized to prepare either concentrated HF or SiF4 and was reduced to practice on the pilot-plant scale. It is described in detail in US patent 3,257,167, issued on June 21, 1966.
Furthermore, the use of SiF4 to produce fluorochemicals was extensively studied in the early ’60s at Stauffer and is described in US patent 3,287,426 by Attila Pavlath and me, issued on Nov. 22, 1966, and in the publication “Silicon Tetrafluoride, a New Fluorinating Agent” (J. Org. Chem. 1964, DOI: 10.1021/jo01033a052). The use of SiF4 for producing hydrohalocarbon and halocarbon compounds has also been patented by Bamidele Omotowa in 2009 in the world patent WO 2009/032849 A1.
Karl O. Christe
Calabasas, California
Frank Davis
As a former graduate student of Frank Davis in the biochemistry department at Rutgers University, I appreciated your commemorating his invention of attaching polyethylene glycol to proteins to escape the body’s immune response (May 31, 2021, page 13).
Before this work he was a nucleic acid chemist who discovered pseudouridine, the most abundant modification in RNA (J. Biol. Chem.1957, 227, 907).
Philip Barnett
New York City
Titanium dioxide in food
This letter is in response to the article on titanium dioxide in food published in C&EN’s May 17, 2021, issue (page 13).
I cannot think of any cogent reason for permitting any purely cosmetic additive in food unless it is a natural constituent of some other foodstuff generally recognized as safe. In my opinion, all artificial food colorings should be banned and the public should be educated to recognize, accept and—ultimately—prefer foods with their natural appearance.
Alexander More
London
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X