Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

Modest Cuts in Co2 Could Cost $1.00 Per Ton

November 7, 2005 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 83, Issue 45

A new EPA analysis shows that modest cuts in utility emissions of carbon dioxide could be achieved at a fairly low cost-as low as $1.00 per ton. The finding is part of an extensive EPA comparison of competing legislative proposals to curb multiple air pollutants from the power sector. One proposal, with the smallest cuts in emissions, would implement President Bush's Clear Skies initiative. A second, championed by Sen. James M. Jeffords (I-Vt.) would make steep cuts in pollution from power plants. A third, sponsored by Sen. Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.) falls between Bush's and Jeffords' plans in the amount of emission reductions. All the proposals would curb utilities' releases of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury; the Carper and Jeffords bills also would mandate CO2 controls. Not surprisingly, EPA found that the Bush initiative would be the least expensive to implement and the Jeffords plan the most costly. The analysis also showed that tradable emission allowances for CO2 under the Carper proposal would cost $1.00 per ton between 2010 and 2015 and rise to $2.00 per ton in 2020. The EPA analysis is posted at www.epa.gov/airmarkets/mp/comparisonbriefing.pdf.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.