ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
COVER STORY
Environmental Play
The specialty chemical industry's ability to develop effective solutions to consumer problems is undisputed. Not always so clear is its ability, particularly in years past, to come up with solutions that do no harm to workers, consumers, or the environment.
In the industry's golden age of the 1950s and '60s, a grateful public unquestioningly accepted new chemicals that seemed to make their lives safer, easier, and more enjoyable. Today, in contrast, there's no hesitation by environmental activists, government agencies, and the public itself to attack any product that even hints at health or environmental problems.
The makers of chemicals that come under fire typically defend their products as safe when used appropriately–and perhaps rightly so. But while they are standing up for their products, competitors are busy coming up with alternatives perceived as safer, such as the phthalate-free plasticizers used in the toys shown above.
In the pages to follow, C&EN examines three products: the dry cleaning solvent perchloroethylene, the family of cosmetics preservatives known as parabens, and the phthalate ester class of polyvinyl chloride plasticizing agents. All face environmental scrutiny, and all are being targeted by specialty chemical companies that see an opportunity. A fourth article looks at a government-commissioned report on phthalate health effects.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter