ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
A National Research Council report calls into question EPA’s proposed reference values and risk estimates for tetrachloroethylene (also known as perchloroethylene or PERC), a common dry-cleaning solvent and metal-degreasing agent. The report, released on Feb. 9, finds that EPA’s draft assessment relied too heavily on studies that had positive results, rather than those with the best study designs and methods for data collection and analysis. “One of the overarching weaknesses of the draft assessment was a lack of critical analysis of the data on which EPA relied in evaluating methodological strengths and weaknesses,” the report notes. EPA’s draft assessment of tetrachloroethylene provides quantitative estimates of both cancer and noncancer effects, such as neurotoxicity. When finalized, these risk estimates will be used to establish standards for air, water, and hazardous waste sites. The NRC report finds that EPA’s classification of tetrachloroethylene as “likely to be a human carcinogen” is supported in its draft assessment, but the report suggests ways to improve estimates of human exposure and cancer potential.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter