ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Of the dozens of regional, state, and local nanotechnology initiatives that were started since 2000, only a handful remain viable. Fifteen of the more successful ones are highlighted below. The year the initiative was formed is in parentheses, and the red type denotes initiatives that receive at least some state funds.
◾ Albany NanoTech Complex (2001)
◾ Arizona Nanotechnology Cluster (2003)
◾ California NanoSystems Institute (2000)
◾ KY NanoNet, in Kentucky (2008)
◾ NanoBusiness Commercialization Association, in Connecticut, formerly the NanoBusiness Alliance (2001)
◾ Nano-Network, in Ohio, a division of PolymerOhio (2003)
◾ Nanotechnology Institute, in Pennsylvania (2000)
◾ National NanoManufacturing Network, in Massachusetts (2006)
◾ North Carolina Center of Innovation for Nanobiotechnology (2009)
◾ North Dakota Centers of Excellence (2005)
◾ Oklahoma Nanotechnology Initiative (2003)
◾ Oregon Nanoscience & Microtechnologies Institute (2004)
◾ Pennsylvania NanoMaterials Commercialization Center (2006)
◾ Texas Emerging Technology Fund (2005)
◾ WVNano Initiative, in West Virginia (2004)
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X