ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The Food & Drug Administration has banned the use of bisphenol A (BPA) in epoxy resins that coat infant formula cans, the agency announced in a rule issued July 12. But the move occurs in a product vacuum: The packaging industry—under pressure from consumers concerned about the chemical’s possible estrogenic effects—abandoned such uses of BPA several years ago.
FDA acknowledged that it was acting after the fact and not because of health worries, noting the action is based only “on a determination of abandonment and is not related to the safety of BPA.”
With the ban, the agency was formally responding to a March 2012 petition from then-Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.)—now serving in the Senate—who claimed that industry was no longer using BPA in infant formula packaging. Last year, FDA banned the use of BPA in baby bottles and toddler cups for the same reason.
“FDA’s authority to act on this petition is based solely on marketplace conditions,” says Steven G. Hentges, head of the Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group at the American Chemistry Council, an industry group.
Although FDA has repeatedly said that BPA is safe in food packaging, consumer groups and a few lawmakers continue to push for a ban on BPA in all food and beverage containers. Markey has pledged that, as a senator, he will continue his work to ensure that the nation’s entire food supply is BPA-free.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X