ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
More than $28 billion per year is spent in the U.S. on basic drug research that cannot be replicated, according to a study published last week (PLOS Biol. 2015, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165). The analysis of government data by researchers at the Global Biological Standards Institute and Boston University reveals that as much as 50% of all preclinical research in the U.S. might not be reproducible. “While false positives are an inevitable part of scientific research, our study shows that the current level of irreproducibility in preclinical research is very costly,” says Timothy S. Simcoe, one of the paper’s authors and a Boston University professor. The authors find that more than half of the reproducibility glitches fall into one of two categories: problems with biological reagents or materials (36%) and errors in study design (28%). Developing standards and best practices for reproducibility could promote research that more quickly leads to useful therapeutics and cures, the authors say.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X