Brexit pondered at European science conference | August 1, 2016 Issue - Vol. 94 Issue 31 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 94 Issue 31 | p. 11 | News of The Week
Issue Date: August 1, 2016

Brexit pondered at European science conference

U.K. scientists state need to retain funding, mobility
Department: Business
Keywords: policy, Brexit, Europe, horizon 2020
[+]Enlarge
The EuroScience Open Forum, a pan-European general science conference, was held in Manchester, England, July 23–27.
Credit: Alex Scott/C&EN
The sign outside the building where the EuroScience Open Forum was held.
 
The EuroScience Open Forum, a pan-European general science conference, was held in Manchester, England, July 23–27.
Credit: Alex Scott/C&EN

Amid lofty talk about innovation and science policy at last week’s EuroScience Open Forum (ESOF) in Manchester, England, scientists and industrialists called for action to blunt the impact of Britain’s planned exit from the European Union. The so-called Brexit is expected to be implemented in about two years.

Anne Glover, former science adviser to the president of the European Commission (EC) and former adviser to the Scottish government, said she is pushing for the U.K. government to exempt U.K.-based scientists from any future restrictions on mobility after the Brexit. Scientific collaboration between the U.K. and EU is extremely important, she said.

Glover also proposed that U.K. funding of about $1 billion per year for Horizon 2020, the EU’s flagship science research program, be maintained.

Glover’s comments were echoed by other ESOF speakers, including Juergen Maier, chief executive of Siemens UK, and Robert-Jan Smits, director-general of the EC’s department for research and innovation.

“We hope of course that we can continue operations as they are,” Smits told C&EN. “For the time being, it is all business as usual. But there will be no more business as usual after two years. Yes, it’s a huge concern for us. We are utterly shocked by what happened.”

Glover and some other ESOF speakers were critical of Jo Johnson, the U.K. government minister for science, because he attended ESOF but wouldn’t engage with delegates in discussions about the Brexit. Still, Siemens’s Maier said recent discussions he had with U.K. officials have convinced him that the U.K. government is listening to the concerns of the academic and industrial communities.

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment