Volume 95 Issue 33 | p. 10 | News of The Week
Issue Date: August 21, 2017 | Web Date: August 17, 2017

Secrets of stimulant abused in Middle East revealed

Vaccines help uncover how “pharmacoterrorism” drug fenethylline works in the body
Department: Science & Technology
Keywords: Vaccines, fenethylline, Captagon, pharmacoterrorism, amphetamine, theophylline
Enzymes break down fenethylline into two metabolites. The dashed line is where an enzyme splits the drug.
Reaction scheme shows how fenethylline is enzymatically oxidized to theophylline and amphetamine in the body.
Enzymes break down fenethylline into two metabolites. The dashed line is where an enzyme splits the drug.

In the Middle East, the stimulant fenethylline is widely abused by young people. Terrorist organizations such as the Islamic State give it to devotees to enhance their aggression, alertness, fearlessness, motivation, and physical performance. And terrorists involved in the 2015 Paris attacks are suspected to have taken the drug.

When Kim D. Janda of Scripps Research Institute California learned about the fenethylline abuse issue, he wondered why addicts and terrorists latched onto the drug instead of its key metabolite, amphetamine, which acts similarly, is easier to synthesize, and is more readily available than fenethylline. Janda and his colleagues developed a new vaccine-based strategy to find out why. The method could also determine how other complex drugs and their metabolites work in the body.

Fenethylline was first produced by a Degussa subsidiary in 1961 and went by several trade names, the best known of which is Captagon. Doctors in Europe prescribed the drug for about two decades as a stimulant, antidepressant, and treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. It was never approved in the U.S., and most countries banned it in the 1980s to try to curb its widespread abuse.

In the body, enzymes oxidize fenethylline to produce amphetamine and theophylline. To piece together the effects of fenethylline and these metabolites, Janda, Cody J. Wenthur, and Bin Zhou developed a new multiple-vaccine strategy called Determining the Identities of Species Supporting Expression of CNS Activity through Incremental Vaccination, or DISSECTIV (Nature 2017, DOI: 10.1038/nature23464).

The scientists used vaccines—protein conjugates of fenethylline-, amphetamine-, and theophylline-like molecules—to elicit antibodies that bind to and disable the activity of the parent compound and its metabolites. They dosed vaccinated mice with fenethylline and studied the animals’ responses: anxiety, alertness, and other physiological effects. By analyzing the mice’s responses to antibodies that inhibit the drug and its metabolites alone or in combinations, they determined the effects of each.

They found that fenethylline itself isn’t responsible for the drug’s stimulating effects. Instead, theophylline, which blocks adenosine receptors in the brain, and amphetamine, which enhances dopamine signaling, act together to cause psychoactive effects that are faster and much more potent than those of amphetamine alone. This mechanism provides insight into why people prefer abusing fenethylline over amphetamine, Janda says.

He notes that a dual vaccine against both amphetamine and theophylline could be developed to treat fenethylline addiction in people. Ornella Corazza of the University of Hertfordshire—who is developing policy recommendations on handling fenethylline addiction with Andres Roman-Urrestarazu of the Cambridge Institute of Public Health—says such a vaccine could be “groundbreaking.” But Corazza points out that a vaccine alone won’t solve a complex problem of addiction that also involves terrorists and criminal organizations.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Richard (Thu Aug 17 22:55:37 EDT 2017)
Isn't this like theobromine and phenylethylamine in chocolate? And what about that ethylene linker? This theophylline-acetaldehyde was not analyzed in mice? The incorporated reference of Yoshimura et al., Xenobiotica, 1988, clearly shows that this is the major metabolite in human and rats. Why is this missing in the mice study? They can't just determine the effects of some metabolites and their vaccination, if the major metabolites are left out.

This paper clearly benefits from its exaggerating and unfounded meaning for terrorism.
Istvan Ujvary (Fri Aug 18 02:02:24 EDT 2017)
As usual, the Janda-group has done a nice scientific study regardless of their drug-political motive or conclusions. However, I find the propagation of the 'Captagon' myth unfortunate. While pharmaceutical Captagon pills originally contained phenethylline, current illicit pills rarely contain this internationally scheduled amphetamine-theophylline covalent dimer. Forensic analyses of seized pills have shown the active ingredient to be amphetamine; caffeine (not theophylline!) as a cutting agent is often present. From a chemical point of view: why would one make additional synthetic effort(s) of joining internationally scheduled amphetamine with a xanthine when simple physical mixing would do the job (as we know from the use of amphetamine-type stimulants in recent military history...)?
So it is amphetamine dependence and not fenethylline dependence which is a problem that should be adressed.
For further information, see:
https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/Booklet_4_Market_Analysis_of_Synthetic_Drugs_ATS_NPS.pdf (p. 15)

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment