ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Safety

U.S. consumer safety agency to ban toxic flame retardants in some products

by Britt E. Erickson
September 25, 2017 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 95, ISSUE 38

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) agreed to ban organohalogen flame retardants in four types of household products. The affected products are durable infant and toddler items, residential furniture, mattresses and mattress pads, and outer casings on electronics. On Sept. 20, commissioners voted 3-2 to grant a petition for the ban filed by a coalition of medical and consumer groups, scientists, and firefighters. Those who voted in favor of the petition claim that organohalogen flame retardants are too hazardous to put in certain products. Researchers have associated this class of chemicals with reproductive, genotoxic, immunotoxic, neurotoxic, and carcinogenic effects in animal studies. Those who voted against the petition pointed out that CPSC scientists recommended denying the petition because of limited exposure data. CPSC next will convene a group of external experts called a Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel to identify data gaps and help the agency as it initiates the rule-making process. In the meantime, CPSC will alert the public to the serious hazards of organohalogen flame retardants and issue guidance to manufacturers not to use the chemicals in specific products.

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
Ron Myers (October 16, 2017 12:12 PM)
As a scientist having prior R&D experience relating to relatively safer, non-halogenated flame retardants (FRs), I would enthusiastically agree that organohalogen FRs are far too hazardous, especially for the cited consumer product applications. In my opinion, these FRs should have been removed from the market years ago; hopefully, this time the ban will be effective.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment