Brazil asbestos ban impacts U.S. imports | December 18, 2017 Issue - Vol. 95 Issue 49 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 95 Issue 49 | p. 16 | News of The Week
Issue Date: December 18, 2017 | Web Date: December 14, 2017

Brazil asbestos ban impacts U.S. imports

Russia is now the sole source of carcinogenic mineral for the U.S.
Department: Government & Policy
Keywords: Chemical regulation, asbestos, Brazil, chlor-alkali
[+]Enlarge
Chrysotile, shown here, is the most commonly used form of asbestos.
Credit: Shutterstock
Chrysotile asbestos mineral fibers.
 
Chrysotile, shown here, is the most commonly used form of asbestos.
Credit: Shutterstock

The U.S. chlor-alkali industry is feeling the hit from a Nov. 29 ruling of the Brazil Supreme Federal Court that bans the mining, use, and commercialization of asbestos in Brazil. About 95% of the asbestos used in the U.S. in 2016 was imported from Brazil, with the rest coming from Russia. The chlor-alkali industry used nearly all of the material, or about 340 metric tons, according to estimates by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Much of the U.S. chlor-alkali industry still uses asbestos diaphragms to produce chlorine. The industry is phasing out such diaphragms and replacing them with more expensive ion-exchange membranes as has been done in Europe to replace mercury cells (see page 12), but not all companies have made the switch.

Some members of Congress are raising concerns about having Russia as the sole supplier of asbestos to the U.S. By continuing to allow industrial use of asbestos, a known carcinogen, the Environmental Protection Agency “is protecting Russian mining at the expense of American workers,” Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) said during a Dec. 7 subcommittee hearing of the House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee. Pallone and other Democrats are urging EPA to use its new authorities under the revised Toxic Substances Control Act to ban the use of asbestos in the U.S.

EPA announced in June that it would evaluate asbestos manufacturing, processing, and distribution as part of an upcoming risk assessment. Pallone asked EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt why the agency is not also considering the use and disposal of the mineral.

“The use and disposal of asbestos is the main source of risk from asbestos,” Pallone said. “If you ignore those things, you will produce a risk assessment that fails to capture the risks to workers and ordinary Americans and, in my opinion, will not be scientifically valid and will not be protective of public health.” Pruitt agreed, saying disposal of asbestos is a “very important factor that we need to consider.”

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO), an advocacy group, welcomes the Brazil court ruling. “This decision sounds a clarion call reaffirming there is no safe or controlled use of asbestos,” says ADAO cofounder Linda Reinstein.

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Comments
Jim Vallette (Tue Dec 19 14:41:09 EST 2017)
In our submission to the U.S. EPA (https://healthybuilding.net/uploads/files/saferchemicals-asbestos.pdf), we name those companies still using asbestos diaphragm to create chlorine and caustic soda. Over 50% of the chlorine produced in the U.S. uses this antiquated technology. Asbestos imports by Occidental Chemical and Olin Corporation more than doubled from 2015 to 2016, perhaps indicating a stockpiling of asbestos in anticipation of further restrictions on mining in Brazil. Oxy imported 900,000 pounds of asbestos from Oct. 2013 through 2015, but apparently failed to report those imports to the EPA in possible violation of the Chemical Data Reporting rule as required under TSCA. Asbestos imports from Russia supplied Dow Chemical (in 2014) and Olin (in 2016). Olin took ownership of Dow’s chlor-alkali plants in the USA, in 2016. Now over 50% of the U.S. chlor-alkali industry’s must rely upon its back-up plan: the massive mine in Asbest, Russia, owned by an associate of Vladimir Putin. Dow also relies upon Russian asbestos for its huge chlor-alkali plant in Stade, Germany.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment