ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
In the rush to register new pesticides before the end of Donald J. Trump’s presidency, the US Environmental Protection Agency gave citrus growers a couple of new options to help combat citrus greening and canker—two diseases that the EPA says have led to $1.75 billion in losses over the past decade.
One of the options is aldicarb, an older carbamate insecticide that the EPA declared in 2010 “may pose unacceptable dietary risks, especially to infants and young children.” Aldicarb and its degradation products are neurotoxic and can contaminate groundwater.
In light of the EPA’s 2010 health assessment, the sole manufacturer of the pesticide at the time, Bayer CropScience, agreed to stop selling it in the US by 2014 and end its use on citrus immediately. But in 2011, the EPA gave the green light to another company, AgLogic, to market aldicarb in the US for use on a few crops, including cotton and sweet potatoes. Now, the EPA has agreed to allow AgLogic to sell aldicarb for use on up to 100,000 acres of oranges and grapefruits in Florida until April 30, 2023.
The other tool that the Trump EPA gave citrus growers is the antibiotic streptomycin, which is a critical medicine for treating bacterial infections in humans. The agency will allow growers nationwide to use the antibiotic on all commercial citrus until Jan. 12, 2028.
Many environmental groups and public health officials are concerned that use of antibiotics in agriculture will accelerate the development of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics.
“The science of resistance is evolving and there is a high level of uncertainty in how and when resistance occurs,” the EPA says in its Jan. 12 registration decision. The agency imposed restrictions, such as preventing spray drift and requiring additional protection for pesticide handlers, to reduce the potential for antibiotic resistance.
“These reckless approvals will harm children and farmworkers and further hamper our ability to combat major public health crises,” Nathan Donley, a senior scientist at the environmental group Center for Biological Diversity, says in a statement. “The Biden administration must immediately reverse these dangerous, immoral decisions by Trump appointees untethered from science and reality.”
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X